Skip to main content

The Cannon 100-500 RF lens, A review from a bird photography perspective

     


I’ve been using my new Cannon lens for approaching two months now and thought it would be useful to share my experience with birders who read my blog. Very unfairly, I will compare it to my other go to lens combination, my cannon 500mm with x2 converter and RF adaptor.

 

Ease of use

 

It would not be an exaggeration to say that my new zoom lens has revolutionised the way I birdwatch. This is a simple and obvious result of the relative weight and size. While the 500mm prime comes in at a hefty 3.2kg the zoom lens is more than 50% lighter at just 1.5Kg. It is also a third shorter. 

 

The large cumbersome 500 prime always limited how far it was comfortable to walk. Compared to this I hardly notice I’m carrying the zoom lens. This means I’m happy, for instance, wandering around the Wyre Forest for 7 hours. Something I would not contemplate with the 500mm prime where I would tend to stay in one or two spots.


    


 

Image Softness

 

As you would expect, the images with the zoom lens are noticeably softer than those shot with the prime. This is hardly surprising given that the prime is four times the cost and has much larger lens elements.

 

A prime is designed for maximum sharpness at its given focal length whereas sharpness on a zoom is always compromised by the averaging effect of maximising sharpness across a range of focal lengths.

 

Having said that, with appropriate post processing of RAW images using a gentle combination of Lightroom and Topaz software, the images are quite acceptable. I say gentle as I see many pictures processed by Topaz which are over sharpened leading to unusual artefacts in the final image.

 

Use with x1.4 extender

 

There is an oddity using the zoom lens with an extender. It limits the travel of the zoom lens such that the minimum focal length is much increased. I’m guessing this has been done to keep the overall size of the lens down but it is a very annoying feature and negates some of the advantage of a variable focal length when used for bird photography. When using the prime lens with x2 extender the small field of view at some x20 magnification can make it quite troublesome to find the bird, particular in more challenging habitat, for example a warbler in a hedge. The big advantage of the zoom  is that you can find the bird at smaller magnification and then zoom onto it. This is also particularly useful for fast moving birds in flight. With the extender on you can only zoom down to around 300mm somewhat negating this advantage.

 

Minimum aperture


At f8 this is one area where the prime plus 2x extender has a major advantage over the f10 zoom  at 500mm with x1.4. I like to shoot with the lens wide open where at all possible as this blurs any background distractions and leads the viewers eye to the subject. I suspect that the resulting reduction in light gathering capability will also be more noticeable in lower winter lighting which will push the iso number up at constant shutter speed. This will result in noisier images but again the excellent ability of the recently introduced noise reduction function in Lightroom will to some extent negate this.

 

Auto focus

 

I’ve found no noticeable difference in the excellent auto focus capability of both of these lenses. I have my R5 set up with eye detection on one of the back buttons, a feature I love and use regularly.

 

Focusing ring

 

The manual focusing ring on the zoom is tiny, much smaller than the prime lens even allowing for the proportional size reduction. In practice this can make it hard to locate a bird when looking through the view finder. Quite often with mobile birds you have a relatively short time for the autofocus to lock on before the bird moves so quickly locating the manual focus ring becomes very important.

 

General build quality

 

No issues here at all. The exceptional general build quality is what all users of the Cannon professional lens range have come to expect.

 

Summary

 

I would highly recommend the zoom lens for bird photography, especially when a lot of walking is involved. For hide photography, however, I will use the prime. Overall owning both the prime and zooms covers all bases and I’m exceptionally happy to have both in my armoury.

 

Footnote – my blogs are posted with sometimes rather imaginative spelling and grammar due to my extreme dyslexia!  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Albert the Albatross

  What is more improbable -   a)     England’ football team    beating Germany in the knockout stages of a major competition   b)     Seeing an Albatross in England   Actually the answer is a) because it has not happened since 1966 rather than b) as Albert the Albatross, as he is affectionally known, has made a number of passing visits to the UK since 1967!   On Monday evening reports started to emerge of Albert associating with the Gannet colony at RSPB Bempton Cliffs in Yorkshire, almost one year after his    last brief visit to the same site. During the intervening period there have been a number of sightings of Albert across Europe, particularly from the Baltic Sea where he appears to have spent much of the last 12 months. In fact there were reports that he had been attacked and killed in the area by two eagles.    Reports of his death were clearly greatly exaggerated!   The Black-browed Albatross is ci...
2 comments
Read more

The Hawfinches of the Forest of Dean

   Hawfinch - Forest of Dean, winter 2017 A highlight of my winter birding is my annual trip to the Forest of Dean to see Hawfinches. I was unable to go last year due to the post-Christmas lockdown so this year’s visit was even more richly anticipated than normal.   Parkend in the Forest of Dean is my usual chosen location for watching Hawfinches. Here the proven technique of using your car as a hide normally works well. I must also say that,  after a number of quite strenuous twitches recently, I was also looking forward to a much more leisurely birding session!   The story of Hawfinches in the UK is, to my mind at least, a fascinating one. It is what is known as an eruptive species meaning that it occasionally erupts from its traditional breeding grounds to invade on mass countries much further away. This is thought to be driven by a combination of breeding success and local crop failure resulting in not enough food to go around.    Records indi...
3 comments
Read more

A visit to see a controversial Canvasback and thoughts on its provenance

   Canvasback ( its the one with the long black beak) curtsey of Nick Truby   Ornamental ducks are perhaps the most difficult and controversial birds that are on the current  British bird list. They are widely kept in collections and as such differentiating a genuine wild vagrant from an escapee is extremely challenging and sometimes impossible. I’ve discussed the issue of proving a birds provenance before, see here , but in summary a ring or isotopic analysis of a sample are required to prove beyond all doubt that the bird is a genuine vagrant. In the absence of this objective evidence of origin much more subjective factors are used to prove that the bird is “probably” a genuine wild bird. You could, however,  strongly argue that in the absence of the definitive evidence above, none of these ornamental ducks should be on the UK list of accepted wild birds   The Canvasback is the North American cousin of our common Pochard and is kept in some UK o...
2 comments
Read more